Today I had finally put a different subject to law. I can even the Causa Guttenberg no longer heard.
On one of the comments on my post yesterday - " harm he has only himself" - but I could , Read that I have not written too much about the CSU-Star, but obviously not enough if still not become evident where the problem really lies.
is consensus: Guttenberg has plagiarized, lied and surreptitiously a title.
In the meantime he was stripped of the title and the University of convicted thief of intellectual property has apologized for "mistakes".
to think that the issue had done so, who would not after all the Guttenberg track, but it is a fallacy.
the following reasons:
1)
Each convicted thief has to fear sanctions beyond the course of the return of the (mental or physical) property. If I steal my neighbor's Mercedes, three years driving around with it, will eventually get caught, then deny the first Mercedes to have stolen and only upon presentation of vehicle registration admit my neighbor "to have made a mistake," not the issue done so that I give him the car back finally.
And certainly not the return of a generous deed by me. Thus also in Guttenberg, who had not decide whether he retains the title or not.
"This number has called Bundestag President Norbert Lammert (CDU) on Thursday of the Elders of the Parliament, told participants. In any case, a permit had been submitted to the federal administration for publication. This is According to the regulations actually required. Lammert, the adoption of the texts in the dissertation as "depressingly clear," have called. Guttenberg was on Wednesday declared before the Bundestag, there were "four drafts" of the Research Service of the Federal Parliament "as a primary source incorporated in the work".
( Spon 24/02/2011)
back but do not remain just a little scorched Minister, but a devastated academic landscape. This is not just the fact that now have to ask hundreds of thousands of examiners, which standards of independence and originality, they have to apply to the work of their candidates. It is even less because the gap between a "summa cum laude and a doctorate degree but knew a considerable degree of arbitrariness in dealing with theses on the part of the university disclosed.
The main reason is that clear in this affair was what the ruling actually staff the University thinks. there were other problems as footnotes in Germany, "said Volker Bouffier, the Hessian Minister President (as if plagiarism would like footnotes). And Merkel said they have a defense minister and no academic staff appointed (as if a deceiver and blenders would be the same as an assistant). The two know agree with much of the population, the academic fraud in the operation apparently a venial sin holds - as opposed to fraud in the sport, on doping, which is ruthlessly punished in the eyes of the same people.
( Thomas Steinfeld 02/24/2011 )
CDU and CSU are dependent on Guttenberg's popularity.
So he must be rescued - at any price. And that is: poison and bitterness in Parliament. Guttenberg was detrimental to peace in the Parliament and hardened the battle lines between government and opposition extreme. Barbara Hendricks almost crying with rage. Half an hour is Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, especially in the Bundestag asked about his thesis was. Now the SPD treasurer stands in the foyer of the Reichstag and hears with to, as the CSU representative Hans Michelbach sneers at the opposition. Faint idea was that mocks Michael Bach, "it's just the way that MPs can not ask." Hendricks cook even more. A word of honor, the student has signed statement to Guttenberg with his old university at that time that he had acted properly. And now, excuse me, and that's it? "You probably take the tacitly accepted in that bourgeois culture is in breach," Hendricks calls. Suddenly, Volker Kauder in front. "At home they say: Stay chremig," says the Union party leader. It will probably seem soothing. Hendricks explodes: "... and you continue to lubricate your Liars and hypocrites! "If it has come so far in the Reichstag, it's come a long way.
( Robert Birnbaum 24/02/2011)
It is not ". equal rights for all"
until 2010 was an almost identical case - the CDU local politicians Andreas Kasper had just as Google Mountain his Dr. title by plagiarism erschummelt -. handled differently, the young, aspiring politician must Unions To defend for weeks now. A scientist has become aware that the man has plagiarized. The university investigated, it starts a fight. "To the best knowledge and belief," he had made the promotion, defended the Union leaders. But it is not enough. In the end, Andreas Kasper go. He loses his doctorate, he loses his job, he loses his existence. Paragraphs, he had copied from texts, without quoting the sources correctly. Kasper feels the Criminal Law: In January 2010, the prosecutor an order of punishment imposed with 90 daily rates of 100 € for breach of copyright. Kasper is charged.
( Gordon Repinsk 02/23/2011 )
course, Mr. Kasper loses his job, his office and his role in the party.
Sometimes there were fines, said a spokesman for the university. According to a report of the Central German newspaper "has been degraded at the University of Munich two years ago, a Bundeswehr officer, because he filed a partially written-exam work have. The Bundeswehr University in Hamburg stressed crack down deceiver.
( FTD.de )
"And Merkel is facing two crystal clear alternatives: either they immediately fired Guttenberg and finished his increasingly grotesque attempts to stylize himself a victim of a campaign. Or she stops him, the impostor set. And that is, faking, cheating and plagiarism in the future fall plus subsequent spin from the "not bad". An error, nothing more. Who is popular, may this really what all this talk of that righteousness, which claims the Union so much for itself, mockery.
( Stefan Reinecke 23/02/2011)
In the open letter reads: "Unfortunately some politicians represented by the position it had at the behavior of the PhD is a minor offense such as illegal parking act that everywhere in the scientific enterprise is unusual, so that this particular case was ever revealed only to lead a 'smear campaign' or even a 'politically motivated attack from the far left outside' against a government politician .
A fatal impression find the signatories of the letter. you want, they write, "will continue to be able, with great severity the standards of scientific work" to teach the students. But this could not, "if the impression common is plagiarism in academia are quite common and would only exceptionally by Radical left uncovered.
Wolfgang Heubisch, Bavarian FDP Minister of Science, has now responded to the public call the Munich professors. "Plagiarism in academic work is no trifle," said Heubisch. The indispensable basis of all scientific work with strict honesty counted in terms on the contributions of partners, competitors and predecessors, including the obligation to produce evidence of quotations.
( Spon 24/02/2011)
He is a notorious liar, who has coiffed to x places his resume he lied obviously in dealing with Wiechert and Schneider cock and he lied in the past week almost every day, saying only that it was "absurd" his doctoral thesis to criticize, then noted that the work is not plagiarism, and even yesterday in front of parliament said NOT to have been deceived.
It's about the law relevant to the charge of "deliberate deception", the Bayreuth has yet investigated, although at this point is as good as clear that Guttenberg - again - is lying when he says they were "the error "only come across by accident.
New however is the boldness with which the accused attempted to reinterpret the affair as a continuation of their own heroic story. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, it contrived to present themselves in the Bundestag as a model. His claim: would handle all the scientists so self-critical of himself as he did, the academic world would be better. The man, who glued his university, his supervisor and the science says no such leaders before. He has stolen from vanity and careerism other authors. The issue a special permit had to write a PhD at the earliest possible date in the letter head can and then fraudulently award was for many years. That is breathtaking.
( Lutz Kinkel 02/24/2011)
The taxpayer will fund as the bill for Guttenberg Eigenlobkampagne.
The picture had also been the threads in the dismissal of captain pulled treasure. The Bild-chief held the baton; Guttenberg jumped good.
know Chancellor Merkel to the popularity Guttenberg, and they also know that they would set their own popularity on the line, when Guttenberg had forced to resign. So she let him give. The damage that it will grow from medium to long term is to not judge, but its outlines are already visible. If a fraud is allowed to stay Ministers can with conservative values such as honor, honesty and decency no longer promote credible. And if a fraud is allowed to stay ministers will also ask other a soft sentence, if they have a scandal at his heels. For those of Merkel often touted educational Republic is the case Guttenberg a catastrophe and every pirate product in China will be laughing up his sleeve. And not to forget: If Guttenberg to such actions such as cobbling together a thesis is capable of what he has hired - and what will he do? Merkel has embarked on a player.
( Lutz Kinkel 02/24/2011)
Finally, I will, however, also recognize a "mistake" which I did.
Not here, but was in a comment on another site I assumed Guttenberg avarice.
If you already would get a mediocre Ghost Writer for 10,000 €, it was very stingy in that Guttenberg no tidy sum for a much better ghost writer and instead wanted to spend even access to the free version of it in the Scientific Service of the Bundestag.
This is wrong!
Guttenberg was not so stingy, but has for his "summa cum laude" a three-quarter of a million euros to the University of Bayreuth "donation."
EUR 750 000 for the University of Bayreuth.
While working on his dissertation, has operated the CSU politician Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg at the University of Bayreuth about his family as a sponsor. Between 1999 and 2006 were for a new chair at the Law and Economics Faculty the University of Bayreuth total of 747 € 764.36 was paid, confirmed the Rhon-Klinikum AG, the Tagesspiegel. Guttenberg sat from 1996 to 2002 Board of Rhön-Klinikum AG, his family was there until 2002, a big block of shares. The CSU politicians studied from 1992 to 1999 in Bayreuth Law and received his doctorate in 2007 with the top grade "summa cum laude.
( Rainer Woratschka 02/24/2011)
The € 750,000 are obviously well spent, because the goodwill of the University of Guttenberg still urgently needs to not end up as criminals guilty of deliberate deception have) since.
Since Guttenberg had asked himself to the deprivation of his doctor's title, had to choose the University of the fast process, "said University President Bormann - and had caused so much misunderstanding.
The Bremer law professor and discoverer of the shortcomings of the thesis of Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, Andreas Fischer-Lescano, complained in the "Tagesspiegel", the Promotion Committee of the University of Bayreuth had "dodged the rating of deception" in the denial of the doctorate .
And SPD interior expert Dieter Wiefelspütz criticized in the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger: "The University of Bayreuth pinches, because they decided not to examine whether there is a deliberate deception -. and despite the most massive evidence "
( Tagesschau.de 24/02/2011)
The University of Bayreuth, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, who removed his doctorate
. . Minister but he remains, at least until further notice, he was "disappointed not aware," he says, who has always read in his dissertation, will think he does not -. in more than a hundred, not even hundreds of reported transfers from works of other authors, many of which are also slightly different from the originals.
( Thomas Steinfeld 24/02/2011 )
And certainly not the return of a generous deed by me. Thus also in Guttenberg, who had not decide whether he retains the title or not.
2)
Guttenberg has a lot of people hurt in practice. First of all the authors to whom he stole the findings and has issued as his. 3)
Guttenberg has harmed the taxpayers, because he has been illegally at the expense of parliament six opinions in the academic service commission and abused for his personal use. "This number has called Bundestag President Norbert Lammert (CDU) on Thursday of the Elders of the Parliament, told participants. In any case, a permit had been submitted to the federal administration for publication. This is According to the regulations actually required. Lammert, the adoption of the texts in the dissertation as "depressingly clear," have called. Guttenberg was on Wednesday declared before the Bundestag, there were "four drafts" of the Research Service of the Federal Parliament "as a primary source incorporated in the work".
( Spon 24/02/2011)
4)
Guttenberg has his old university and in particular his supervisor, Peter Häberle massively harmed by it has damaged their reputation seriously - the supreme good of a university at all. 5)
Guttenberg has harmed the research in Germany. back but do not remain just a little scorched Minister, but a devastated academic landscape. This is not just the fact that now have to ask hundreds of thousands of examiners, which standards of independence and originality, they have to apply to the work of their candidates. It is even less because the gap between a "summa cum laude and a doctorate degree but knew a considerable degree of arbitrariness in dealing with theses on the part of the university disclosed.
The main reason is that clear in this affair was what the ruling actually staff the University thinks. there were other problems as footnotes in Germany, "said Volker Bouffier, the Hessian Minister President (as if plagiarism would like footnotes). And Merkel said they have a defense minister and no academic staff appointed (as if a deceiver and blenders would be the same as an assistant). The two know agree with much of the population, the academic fraud in the operation apparently a venial sin holds - as opposed to fraud in the sport, on doping, which is ruthlessly punished in the eyes of the same people.
( Thomas Steinfeld 02/24/2011 )
6)
Guttenberg has harmed the peace in the Parliament and hardened the battle lines between government and opposition extreme. CDU and CSU are dependent on Guttenberg's popularity.
So he must be rescued - at any price. And that is: poison and bitterness in Parliament. Guttenberg was detrimental to peace in the Parliament and hardened the battle lines between government and opposition extreme. Barbara Hendricks almost crying with rage. Half an hour is Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, especially in the Bundestag asked about his thesis was. Now the SPD treasurer stands in the foyer of the Reichstag and hears with to, as the CSU representative Hans Michelbach sneers at the opposition. Faint idea was that mocks Michael Bach, "it's just the way that MPs can not ask." Hendricks cook even more. A word of honor, the student has signed statement to Guttenberg with his old university at that time that he had acted properly. And now, excuse me, and that's it? "You probably take the tacitly accepted in that bourgeois culture is in breach," Hendricks calls. Suddenly, Volker Kauder in front. "At home they say: Stay chremig," says the Union party leader. It will probably seem soothing. Hendricks explodes: "... and you continue to lubricate your Liars and hypocrites! "If it has come so far in the Reichstag, it's come a long way.
( Robert Birnbaum 24/02/2011)
7)
Guttenberg, finally, by his conduct of democracy as a whole seriously damaged, because now officially the worst prejudice against our form of government is confirmed: It is not ". equal rights for all"
until 2010 was an almost identical case - the CDU local politicians Andreas Kasper had just as Google Mountain his Dr. title by plagiarism erschummelt -. handled differently, the young, aspiring politician must Unions To defend for weeks now. A scientist has become aware that the man has plagiarized. The university investigated, it starts a fight. "To the best knowledge and belief," he had made the promotion, defended the Union leaders. But it is not enough. In the end, Andreas Kasper go. He loses his doctorate, he loses his job, he loses his existence. Paragraphs, he had copied from texts, without quoting the sources correctly. Kasper feels the Criminal Law: In January 2010, the prosecutor an order of punishment imposed with 90 daily rates of 100 € for breach of copyright. Kasper is charged.
( Gordon Repinsk 02/23/2011 )
course, Mr. Kasper loses his job, his office and his role in the party.
8)
Guttenberg disavowed the armed forces, as he now takes out a special law, the armed forces at the two universities in Hamburg and Munich, which are under the supervision of the top would be unthinkable. There counterfeiters are severely punished. Sometimes there were fines, said a spokesman for the university. According to a report of the Central German newspaper "has been degraded at the University of Munich two years ago, a Bundeswehr officer, because he filed a partially written-exam work have. The Bundeswehr University in Hamburg stressed crack down deceiver.
( FTD.de )
9)
Guttenberg with the overall moral to his grave, the Chancellor, permitted under criminal behavior without consequences. "And Merkel is facing two crystal clear alternatives: either they immediately fired Guttenberg and finished his increasingly grotesque attempts to stylize himself a victim of a campaign. Or she stops him, the impostor set. And that is, faking, cheating and plagiarism in the future fall plus subsequent spin from the "not bad". An error, nothing more. Who is popular, may this really what all this talk of that righteousness, which claims the Union so much for itself, mockery.
( Stefan Reinecke 23/02/2011)
10th)
Guttenberg, the faculty total harm, as they may be laughed at in the future if they insist on compliance with scientific standards. Accordingly, they are also acidic. 70 Bayer professors have written an open letter of complaint to the Ministry of Science. In the open letter reads: "Unfortunately some politicians represented by the position it had at the behavior of the PhD is a minor offense such as illegal parking act that everywhere in the scientific enterprise is unusual, so that this particular case was ever revealed only to lead a 'smear campaign' or even a 'politically motivated attack from the far left outside' against a government politician .
A fatal impression find the signatories of the letter. you want, they write, "will continue to be able, with great severity the standards of scientific work" to teach the students. But this could not, "if the impression common is plagiarism in academia are quite common and would only exceptionally by Radical left uncovered.
Wolfgang Heubisch, Bavarian FDP Minister of Science, has now responded to the public call the Munich professors. "Plagiarism in academic work is no trifle," said Heubisch. The indispensable basis of all scientific work with strict honesty counted in terms on the contributions of partners, competitors and predecessors, including the obligation to produce evidence of quotations.
( Spon 24/02/2011)
11)
Guttenberg just not under fire because it 2007 at the Submission of the work Dr. lied in the sworn statement, but because he lied to ever since and now is lying. He is a notorious liar, who has coiffed to x places his resume he lied obviously in dealing with Wiechert and Schneider cock and he lied in the past week almost every day, saying only that it was "absurd" his doctoral thesis to criticize, then noted that the work is not plagiarism, and even yesterday in front of parliament said NOT to have been deceived.
12th)
The issue is not to be recognized that the university has conceded the Dr. title. It's about the law relevant to the charge of "deliberate deception", the Bayreuth has yet investigated, although at this point is as good as clear that Guttenberg - again - is lying when he says they were "the error "only come across by accident.
New however is the boldness with which the accused attempted to reinterpret the affair as a continuation of their own heroic story. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, it contrived to present themselves in the Bundestag as a model. His claim: would handle all the scientists so self-critical of himself as he did, the academic world would be better. The man, who glued his university, his supervisor and the science says no such leaders before. He has stolen from vanity and careerism other authors. The issue a special permit had to write a PhD at the earliest possible date in the letter head can and then fraudulently award was for many years. That is breathtaking.
( Lutz Kinkel 02/24/2011)
13th)
Guttenberg is obviously a crude form of bribery attached. He notes the massive PR Help in the Bild-Zeitung claim that pay is very lucrative for Springer is, by the Ministry of Defence has announced a major recruitment advertising campaign in the PICTURE. The taxpayer will fund as the bill for Guttenberg Eigenlobkampagne.
The picture had also been the threads in the dismissal of captain pulled treasure. The Bild-chief held the baton; Guttenberg jumped good.
14th)
Guttenberg Finally, of course, has seriously damaged the Chancellor, who now stands before the entire press as amoral and future hardly anyone can enter the world of respect for ethical values. know Chancellor Merkel to the popularity Guttenberg, and they also know that they would set their own popularity on the line, when Guttenberg had forced to resign. So she let him give. The damage that it will grow from medium to long term is to not judge, but its outlines are already visible. If a fraud is allowed to stay Ministers can with conservative values such as honor, honesty and decency no longer promote credible. And if a fraud is allowed to stay ministers will also ask other a soft sentence, if they have a scandal at his heels. For those of Merkel often touted educational Republic is the case Guttenberg a catastrophe and every pirate product in China will be laughing up his sleeve. And not to forget: If Guttenberg to such actions such as cobbling together a thesis is capable of what he has hired - and what will he do? Merkel has embarked on a player.
( Lutz Kinkel 02/24/2011)
Finally, I will, however, also recognize a "mistake" which I did.
Not here, but was in a comment on another site I assumed Guttenberg avarice.
If you already would get a mediocre Ghost Writer for 10,000 €, it was very stingy in that Guttenberg no tidy sum for a much better ghost writer and instead wanted to spend even access to the free version of it in the Scientific Service of the Bundestag.
This is wrong!
Guttenberg was not so stingy, but has for his "summa cum laude" a three-quarter of a million euros to the University of Bayreuth "donation."
EUR 750 000 for the University of Bayreuth.
While working on his dissertation, has operated the CSU politician Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg at the University of Bayreuth about his family as a sponsor. Between 1999 and 2006 were for a new chair at the Law and Economics Faculty the University of Bayreuth total of 747 € 764.36 was paid, confirmed the Rhon-Klinikum AG, the Tagesspiegel. Guttenberg sat from 1996 to 2002 Board of Rhön-Klinikum AG, his family was there until 2002, a big block of shares. The CSU politicians studied from 1992 to 1999 in Bayreuth Law and received his doctorate in 2007 with the top grade "summa cum laude.
( Rainer Woratschka 02/24/2011)
The € 750,000 are obviously well spent, because the goodwill of the University of Guttenberg still urgently needs to not end up as criminals guilty of deliberate deception have) since.
Since Guttenberg had asked himself to the deprivation of his doctor's title, had to choose the University of the fast process, "said University President Bormann - and had caused so much misunderstanding.
The Bremer law professor and discoverer of the shortcomings of the thesis of Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, Andreas Fischer-Lescano, complained in the "Tagesspiegel", the Promotion Committee of the University of Bayreuth had "dodged the rating of deception" in the denial of the doctorate .
And SPD interior expert Dieter Wiefelspütz criticized in the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger: "The University of Bayreuth pinches, because they decided not to examine whether there is a deliberate deception -. and despite the most massive evidence "
( Tagesschau.de 24/02/2011)
The University of Bayreuth, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, who removed his doctorate
. . Minister but he remains, at least until further notice, he was "disappointed not aware," he says, who has always read in his dissertation, will think he does not -. in more than a hundred, not even hundreds of reported transfers from works of other authors, many of which are also slightly different from the originals.
( Thomas Steinfeld 24/02/2011 )
0 comments:
Post a Comment